It's something I've touched upon a couple of times before, and it's something I have a great deal of personal interest in; depictions of women in the media, particularly younger females. It's often given a lot more coverage than other topics, it's places a great deal of undue pressures on young girls during a frankly difficult and tumultuous time in life and the media nearly always misrepresents it or flat out gets it wrong.
The reason I've decided today to cover this again is a recent re-read of the classic Spider-Girl #27, specifically the letter page in the back of the issue. A reader wrote in to comment on Marvel's website biography for Spider-Girl. At the time (based on the cover date: December 2000) May's bio listed her height as 5'5'' and weighing 112 pounds. The reader goes on to state that she herself is 5'4 and 120 pounds, and asserts that she is in no way overweight, asks that Marvel take more care in this regard as she would not like her daughter to gain a unrealistic view of a healthy weight. I applaud this considerate reader.
Let's look at some printed sources to see what Marvel's done in this regard since, shall we? Cool.
Remember that silly Battlebook I was telling you about last time? It's a source. In fact, as far as I can tell it's the earliest printed source I can find for May's statistics: Height: Approx. 5'5'' Weight: Approx. 110 lbs. Now, this was November 1998.
Skip forward too the most recent iterations of Official Handbooks to the Marvel Universe, we have the following stats:
The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe A to Z Vol. 11 (first published in 2009) gives us an updated height and weight. Considering Mayday at this point is now around a year older- she was 15 when she first donned the webs, and turned 16 in Spider-Girl #67-makes some sense. Now, Spider-Girl is 5'7'' and weighs 119 lbs. This was still problematic to me.
The height made sense to me, both from how May's height had been depicted through the art and with my previous note about the character's 'ageing up' in the interim. However, the weight seemed too low to me. So, a while back, I contacted the authors of the Handbooks and asked them what thought processes go into generating these particular statistics. Mr Stuart Vandal was kind enough to give his thoughts, which I have re-posted here:
In the case of characters who appeared in older Handbooks, there seemed
to be a definite tendency for women to be underweight - though that
might well have to do with what was considered to be a healthy weight
back in the 1980s perhaps being lower than what we consider to be a
healthy weight today.
For characters who got entries for the first time in more recent
volumes, we try to be as accurate as we can. If a character's personal
stats are given in an actual story, we use those, no matter how unusual
they might appear to be (we reason that there might be an in-story
reason for someone to weigh virtually nothing or to be massively heavier
than they appear, though we do check with writers in the more unlikely
cases, to avoid perpetuating errors).
On heights, we have to accept that artists can be very inconsistent,
but, allowing for that, we look for (a) approximate matches to others
whose heights are already established, and (b) good shots of the
character standing up straight next to someone of established height who
is also standing straight, and all on level ground. Once a reasonable
height is established, I personally check height-weight charts to find
what is considered an appropriate weight for that height - you should
find most newer female characters have what might be considered more
reasonable weights for their height and build.
For oversized or unusual characters, we do take figuring out reasonable
weights seriously. You would not believe the discussions we've had on
the matter, and most of the time we can rely on our resident engineering
wizard, Mike Fichera, to provide useful experiments and calculations.
He's worked out the weights of dismembered individuals' separate body
parts, a skeleton and bee combination (Swarm), living planets, and many
more. Mike also set up got a converter program to allow us to figure out
giants or shrunken individuals - just plug in the weight for someone of
a given regular height, then adjust the height up or down and watch the
weight change accordingly, in proportion to the new height. For
animals, we can rely on head writer Jeff Christiansen, whose
mild-mannered alter ego is a vet.
So....thoughts, anyone? I'm definitely not done with this topic.
Until I wrestle an elephant in a wok and stop caring about this sort of thing, I remain
frogoat